Quasi-experimental research design is used to explore causal relationships in situations where randomization is not possible. Its goal is to evaluate the effect of an intervention or treatment while taking into account the absence of random assignment. For example, it can evaluate the impact of a new teaching strategy in schools where students cannot be randomly assigned to different classes. Although not as robust as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental designs are useful for studying real-world interventions in practical settings.
Methods and methodologies
Pre-test-post-test designs – Pre-test-post-test designs measure the dependent variable before and after an intervention or treatment. This method helps determine whether observed changes can be attributed to the intervention. For example, a study may assess the results in mathematics of students before and after the implementation of a new program.
Researchers identify a treatment group exposed to the intervention and measure its performance or behavior before (pretest) and after (posttest) the intervention. Statistical techniques such as paired t-tests or repeated measures ANOVA assess the significance of observed changes. To strengthen validity, comparisons with an untreated control group or baseline data are often included.
Matched groups – Matched-group designs involve creating treatment and comparison groups that are as similar as possible on key characteristics (e.g., age, socioeconomic status) to minimize confounding variables. For example, researchers can evaluate the effectiveness of a school program by matching participating students with nonparticipating students who have similar educational backgrounds.
Methodology:
Participants are matched on critical variables that may influence the results. One group receives the intervention while the other does not. Statistical methods such as ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) are used to adjust for baseline differences and compare results between groups. Matching helps reduce selection bias and improve the credibility of causal inferences.
Interrupted time series models – Interrupted time series models examine trends in the dependent variable over multiple time points before and after an intervention. For example, a study might track traffic accident rates before and after the implementation of speed cameras.
Methodology:
Data are collected at regular intervals before and after the intervention to assess changes. Statistical analysis includes regression models with time variables to detect trend changes attributable to the intervention. This approach provides stronger evidence of causality when randomization is not possible.
Good practices
Careful correspondence :
Use demographic or background characteristics to create comparable groups and minimize confounding variables.
Include control groups :
Incorporate no-treatment or alternative treatment groups to strengthen causal inferences.
Use statistical controls :
Apply methods such as regression analysis or ANCOVA to adjust for pre-existing differences and isolate intervention effects.
Measure longitudinal outcomes :
Collect data over time to capture trends and provide stronger evidence of causal relationships.
Perform sensitivity analyses :
Test the robustness of the results by exploring alternative matching strategies or statistical approaches.
What to avoid
Selection bias :
Ignoring pre-existing differences between groups can distort results and reduce credibility.
Over-reliance on pre-tests :
Without a control group, pre-test-post-test designs risk attributing changes to the intervention when they may be due to external factors.
Confounding variables :
Failure to control for external influences that might affect the results compromises the validity of the results.
Small or unbalanced samples :
Small sample sizes or unequal group sizes reduce statistical power and limit generalizability.
Overgeneralization :
Avoid applying results from specific quasi-experimental settings to broader populations without careful consideration of limitations.
Conclusion
Quasi-experimental research design is a versatile and practical method for exploring causal relationships when randomization is not possible. By using approaches such as pretest-posttest, matched groups, and interrupted time series designs, researchers can minimize bias and make credible inferences about intervention effects. Adherence to best practices and addressing common pitfalls ensures the reliability and validity of quasi-experimental studies, making them an essential tool in applied research and policy contexts.
EN 
FR